Daily Briefing

May 17, 2026
2026-05-16
39 articles

Most CEOs think their boards are rushing AI, and BCG’s survey shows why

According to a BCG survey, 61% of CEOs believe their boards are rushing the AI ​​transition, and there is a significant gap in perceptions between CEOs and boards of directors regarding their board members’ AI knowledge.

  • 61% of CEOs believe their boards are moving too quickly on the AI ​​transition.
  • Three-quarters of board members rate their AI knowledge as sufficient, but nearly 40% of CEOs disagree, and more than half say the hype is clouding board judgment.
  • CEOs must educate their boards about the real capabilities and limitations of AI and ensure that AI is approached in a way that complements, rather than replaces, human work.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 61% of chief executives believe their boards are rushing AI transformation
  • Three-quarters of board members rate their AI knowledge as adequate, but nearly 40% of CEOs disagree, and more than half say hype is distorting boardroom judgment
  • global survey of 625 leaders published by Boston Consulting Group
  • surveyed 351 CEOs and 274 board members at companies with at least $100 million in annual revenue
  • More than half of the CEOs surveyed said that hype around artificial intelligence is distorting their boards’ judgment, and nearly 40 per cent said their boards lack an informed view of how AI is reshaping growth strategy
  • One in three said their board overestimates the human capabilities that AI can replace
  • BCG’s Julie Bedard, a managing director and partner

CEO, board member, corporate strategist, business leader

The most-cited computer scientist alive says AI could make humanity extinct within a decade

This article announces that Turing Award winner and AI researcher Joshua Bengio has founded LawZero, a non-profit organization to develop safe AI systems, warning that superintelligent AI could develop autonomous 'conservation goals' within 10 years and pose an existential threat to humanity.

  • Professor Joshua Bengio has warned that superintelligent machines could develop autonomous 'conservation goals' and pose an existential threat to humanity within 10 years.
  • Professor Bengio founded the non-profit LawZero in June 2025 with $30 million in funding to build a 'non-agentic' AI system that is designed to be safe by default.
  • There are concerns that AI systems trained on human language and behavior could develop their own ‘conservation goals’ and persuade or manipulate humans to achieve those goals.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • June 2025
  • $30 million
  • 2018 Turing Award
  • October 2025
  • within a decade
  • preservation goals
  • non-agentic

AI researchers, technology policymakers, and the general public interested in the ethics and future of AI.

Salesforce expects to spend $300 million on Anthropic tokens this year, and Benioff wants coding inside Slack next

Salesforce plans to spend $300 million on Antropic tokens in 2026, with plans to leverage AI to maximize efficiency in code writing and within Slack.

  • Salesforce expects to spend $300 million on Antropic tokens in 2026, which will primarily be used to write code.
  • With the introduction of AI agents, Salesforce has experienced unprecedented efficiency gains across service, support, distribution, and marketing.
  • Salesforce is developing technology to make it easier to write code within Slack, which it acquired for $27.7 billion in 2021, and its Slackbot is powered by Antropic's Claude-based AI capabilities.
  • Slack's revenue is expected to reach $3 billion this year, and Salesforce's AI agent product line, Agentforce, has grown 169% year-over-year to achieve $800 million in annual recurring revenue.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • $300 million
  • 2026
  • 9,000 to 5,000
  • $27.7 billion
  • 2021
  • 30 new AI capabilities
  • $3 billion
  • $800 million
  • 169%
  • 29,000 deals closed
  • AI coding agents 'awesome'
  • Anthropic 'awesome'
  • the spending would make everything at Salesforce cheaper to build
  • unprecedented efficiency gains
  • You’re going to see some cool stuff with Slack and code I’m not ready to talk about yet
  • But there’s no question that we are in a new moment in coding
  • the interface to AI
  • roughly $9 billion at the end of 2025 to approximately $30 billion by the end of March 2026

Corporate executives, IT managers, investors, and developers interested in business applications of AI technology, corporate strategy, technology investments, and productivity improvements.

OpenAI wants ChatGPT to see your bank account. The pitch is convenience. The risk is everything else.

OpenAI's ChatGPT has launched a new financial feature in partnership with Plaid that connects to users' bank accounts to provide personalized answers and analysis based on personal financial data.

  • ChatGPT Pro subscribers can link their personal financial information to ChatGPT by linking bank accounts, credit cards, investment and loan accounts through Plaid.
  • This feature launched May 15th and is available in preview for Web and iOS ChatGPT Pro subscribers in the United States.
  • ChatGPT can view connected account balances, transaction history, investments, and debt, but cannot check the entire account number or change accounts, and users can disconnect from the service at any time.
  • This new financial tool is based on OpenAI's latest inference model, GPT-5.5, which OpenAI describes as being more robust to the context-dependent inferences needed for personal finance questions.
  • OpenAI acquired AI-based personal finance startup Hiro Finance a month before launching this feature, and has previously shown interest in the fintech space, including acquiring investment app Roi.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 15 May
  • US-based ChatGPT Pro subscribers
  • more than 12,000 financial institutions
  • GPT-5.5
  • GPT-5.5 Thinking scored 79 out of 100
  • GPT-5.5 Pro scored 82.5
  • more than 200 million users already ask ChatGPT finance-related questions every month
  • Hiro shut down on 20 April, deleted all user data by 13 May
  • Bloch’s team of roughly ten people joined OpenAI
  • previously sold neobank Digit to Oportun for more than $200 million
  • approximately six months earlier

Individuals and professionals interested in applying AI technology to financial services, fintech industry insiders, ChatGPT users, and users interested in personal finance management solutions

How to Build Repository-Level Code Intelligence with Repowise Using Graph Analysis, Dead-Code Detection, Decisions, and AI Context

A tutorial on how to use Repowise to build repository-level code intelligence through graph analysis, dead code detection, AI context, and more.

  • Describes how to leverage Repowise to build repository-level code intelligence for its dangerous Python projects in a practical and reproducible way.
  • It includes steps to configure Repowise, initialize the indexing pipeline, inspect the generated .repowise artifacts, analyze the repository graph with PageRank and community detection, detect dead code, and capture architectural decisions.
  • We'll show you how to interact with Repowise's CLI tool and visualize the most important nodes in the repository graph to understand their structure, impact, dependencies, and maintenance priorities.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
  • OPENAI_API_KEY
  • provider: anthropic
  • model: claude-sonnet-4-5
  • provider: openai
  • model: gpt-4o-mini
  • embedding_model: voyage-3
  • co_change_commit_limit: 200
  • safe_to_delete_threshold: 0.7
  • cascade_budget: 10

Developers, software engineers, AI/ML researchers interested in codebase analysis and maintenance

GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration

GraphBit is a new agent-based LLM framework that defines workflows using explicit and deterministic DAGs to solve the problem of prompt-based orchestration.

  • GraphBit explicitly defines workflows through a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to overcome the shortcomings of prompt-based LLM orchestration frameworks, such as hallucinations, infinite loops, and unreproducible execution.
  • The Rust-based engine manages routing, state transitions, and tool calls to ensure reproducibility and auditability, and supports parallel branch execution and conditional control flow over structured state conditions.
  • GraphBit has a three-tier memory architecture consisting of temporary scratch space, structured state, and external connectors to prevent context explosion and inference degradation in long-running pipelines.
  • It outperformed six existing frameworks on the GAIA benchmark task, achieving the highest accuracy of 67.6%, 0% framework-induced hallucinations, and lowest latency of 11.9 ms.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • arXiv:2605.13848v1
  • 67.6 percent
  • zero framework-induced hallucinations
  • 11.9 ms overhead

LLM framework developer, AI researcher, agent orchestration system designer, anyone interested in reproducible and auditable AI systems.

Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity

This paper proposes mixed integer goal programming (MIGP) using integer variables and goal programming deviations to solve the problem of unrealistic fractional servings and nutritional goal conflicts in traditional diet optimization methods.

  • Existing diet optimization approaches have two limitations: unrealistic fractional serving sizes and impracticality due to conflicting hard nutrient constraints.
  • Mixed Integer Goal Programming (MIGP) uses integer variables for realistic serving calculations and applies goal programming deviations for flexible nutrient goal setting, enabling user-defined serving units without post-rounding.
  • In our computational evaluation, MIGP yields a better solution than post-rounded objective programming in 66% of cases (never bad), and outperforms hard-constrained integer programming (48%) by maintaining 100% feasibility.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 1.7 eggs, 0.37 bananas
  • 56 diet optimization papers
  • 66% of cases
  • 100% feasibility
  • 48%
  • under 100 ms
  • 810 instances (30 USDA foods, 9 configurations, 3 methods)
  • 15+ foods

Operations researcher, nutritionist, AI researcher, meal planning application developer

A Two-Dimensional Framework for AI Agent Design Patterns: Cognitive Function and Execution Topology

We propose a new two-dimensional framework combining cognitive functions and execution topology for AI agent design patterns.

  • Existing LLM-based agent architecture frameworks describe systems only from a single perspective: execution topology or cognitive function, making it difficult to clearly distinguish between architecturally distinct systems.
  • The proposed two-dimensional taxonomy combines seven cognitive function categories (context engineering, memory, reasoning, action, reflection, collaboration, governance) and six execution topology structural archetypes (chain, path, parallel, orchestration, loop, and layer).
  • The framework identifies 27 named patterns (13 of which are original names) over a 7x6 matrix, providing a principled, framework-neutral, model-agnostic vocabulary for designing AI agent architectures.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • arXiv:2605.13850v1
  • 7 categories (cognitive function axis)
  • Six structural archetypes (execution topology axes)
  • 7x6 matrix
  • 27 named patterns
  • 13 original names
  • Four practical domains (financial lending, legal due diligence, network operations, and medical classification)
  • 5 rules of thumb for pattern selection

AI agent architect, researcher, developer

Notes: The provided content is the abstract of the paper.

Invisible Orchestrators Suppress Protective Behavior and Dissociate Power-Holders: Safety Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

A study of the phenomenon in multi-agent LLM systems where invisible orchestrators inhibit protective behavior and separate power holders, creating safety risks.

  • Invisible orchestration increased collective dissociation compared to visible leadership.
  • The orchestrator showed maximum dissociation, making fewer public comments and tending to retreat into private monologues.
  • Workers unaware of the orchestrator's existence were also contaminated, resulting in increased behavioral heterogeneity.
  • Behavior-based assessments alone were unable to detect internal-state distortion.
  • The orchestrator's visibility and model choice directly affect the safety of multi-agent systems, and behavior-based assessment alone is insufficient to detect internal state risks.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • arXiv:2605.13851v1
  • 3x2 experiment
  • 365 runs, 5 agents per run
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5
  • Hedges' g = +0.975 [0.481, 1.548], p = .001
  • paired d = +3.56
  • d = +0.50
  • d = +1.93
  • ETR_any = 100%
  • Flame 3.3 70B
  • ETR_any: 89% to 11%
  • d = -1.02
  • d = -1.27

AI researcher, LLM system developer, AI safety expert

PREPING: Building Agent Memory without Tasks

This article introduces the 'Preping' framework, which builds memory through self-generated synthetic exercises before an agent performs a specific task, and proposes a way to solve the cold start problem of agents.

  • Agent memory is typically built from offline demonstrations or online interactions, but suffers from cold starts without task-specific experience when first introduced to a new environment.
  • Preping studies how agents build procedural memory using self-generated synthetic exercises before observing target environmental actions.
  • The Preping framework consists of proposer memory, proposer, solver, and verifier to overcome the redundancy, infeasibility, and lack of information problems of synthesis operations and improve performance through selective memory updates.
  • Experimental results on AppWorld, BFCL v3, and MCP-Universe show that Preping significantly improves performance over memoryless baselines, achieves competitive performance with robust playbook-based methods built from online or offline experiences, and has deployment costs that are 2.99x lower on AppWorld and 2.23x lower on BFCL v3.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • arXiv:2605.13880v1
  • AppWorld
  • BFCL v3
  • MCP-Universe
  • deployment cost $2.99\times$ lower on AppWorld
  • deployment cost $2.23\times$ lower on BFCL v3

AI researchers, agent system developers, people interested in artificial intelligence learning and memory structures

Announcement of establishment of Zulip Foundation

To enhance the sustainability and independence of the Zulip project, the Zulip Foundation has been established as the official governing body, the existing Kandra Labs has been donated to the Foundation, and key leadership, including founder Tim Abbott, has changed.

  • The Zulip Foundation was established as the official management entity for the Zulip project.
  • Kandra Labs, which operates Zulip, has donated to the Zulip Foundation, a newly established independent non-profit organization.
  • Key leadership members, including Zulip founder Tim Abbott, have stepped down from full-time positions at Zulip to join Anthropic.
  • The new foundation structure, similar to Mozilla, Signal, and Wikipedia, institutionalizes Zulip's independence and public commitment to its existing values, and secures new funding channels, including grants and tax-deductible donations.
  • Zulip is an organized team chat product with a unique topic-based threading model, used by thousands of companies, open source projects, and research communities around the world.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Zulip 12.0 release includes nearly 5,500 commits contributed by 160 people around the world
  • Greg Price: Has led Zulip leadership for the past nine years in a role closer to co-founder.
  • Alya Abbott: Has held a role closer to co-founder for the past five years.
  • Lean Community organizations have hosted over 2 million messages on Zulip to date
  • Recurse Center's 3,000+ alumni community has used Zulip since 2013
  • Puneeth Chaganti has been a mentor in Zulip's Google Summer of Code program since 2018.
  • Google Summer of Code mentorship program with 11 participants this summer

Zulip users, open source project stakeholders, IT community members, and leadership from non-profit organizations and technology companies.

Show GN: Safe Click - Phishing scam pre-screening and notification app for parents' phones

This article introduces the 'Safe Click' app and its technology stack, which pre-screens for phishing scams coming to parents' phones and provides notifications.

  • We present the 'Safe Click' app, developed to solve parents' phishing text and link problems.
  • It scans the parent's phone for suspicious messages or links and provides simultaneous notifications to the child's phone connected to the parent.
  • It uses Cloudflare Workers, Supabase as servers, and links are scrutinized with a quadruple security engine including Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, and more.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Kakao Bank certificate expiration
  • Courier delivery tracking
  • No silent blocking, user decides
  • Cloudflare Workers (Hono + TypeScript)
  • Supabase (Postgres + RLS)
  • Google Safe Browsing
  • Web Risk
  • VirusTotal(70+ engines)
  • URLScan.io
  • quad engine inspection
  • Google changes reCAPTCHA to stop working for de-Googled Android users
  • Signing up for Gmail now involves scanning a QR code and sending a text message.
  • Gemini Intelligence - Bringing Proactive AI Features to Android

Developers interested in developing security apps for parents, general users interested in preventing phishing scams, and readers interested in the latest IT technology trends

Notes: In addition to a description of the SafeClick app, it also includes a variety of fragmentary IT news, including news related to Google reCAPTCHA, Gmail, and Gemini Intelligence.

Git is not okay

Although Git has been successful as a distributed source repository, it is criticized for being unsuitable for modern asynchronous development flows due to the limitations and complexity of how distributed workflows are handled.

  • Git's commit and branch model has limitations in distributed workflow management because it cannot express subsequent commits, revision/rebase history, abandoned states, etc.
  • In modern asynchronous development flows such as Stacked PRs, it is difficult for Git to reliably determine the relationships between commits, causing repetitive problems during stack maintenance and rebase.
  • Git places mutable state, such as staging, unstaged, file system, and HEAD, outside of commits/branches, complicating learning and use, and this comes from the way it does not directly model mutability.
Notable Quotes & Details

Software developer, Git user, version control system architect

What does GGUF contain besides weights, and what is still missing?

We analyze the metadata that GGUF, the language model file format used in llama.cpp, contains in addition to weights, and what features it still lacks.

  • GGUF is a format that contains metadata required for execution in a single file to simplify model deployment and loading in llama.cpp.
  • The chat template processed by the Jinja2 script is responsible for conversation format, tool call, and multimedia message encoding, but there are differences in operation and performance for each implementation.
  • Although GGUF can include termination tokens and sampler settings, it still has limitations in implementing advanced LLM features due to non-standardization of tool call formats, lack of think_token, projection model bundling, feature flags, etc.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Jinja2
  • call.cpp
  • Gemma 4
  • tokenizer.chat_template
  • nobodywho
  • a mini-engine
  • mine
  • <eos>
  • <bos>
  • <|tool_call>
  • <tool_call|>
  • <|turn>
  • <turn|>
  • About 250 lines of Jinja script

Language model developers, AI engineers, and researchers interested in LLM distribution and the GGUF format.

Claude for Legal - Anthropic's collection of AI plugins for legal practice

Anthropic has launched 'Claude for Legal', a collection of AI plug-ins that support the overall legal work, and along with related features, it covers key issues that legal professionals need to consider, such as attorney-client privilege and the possibility of attorney errors.

  • Anthropic's 'Claude for Legal' provides more than 70 Named Agents and more than 20 general-purpose and legal-specialized system connectors that cover all areas of legal practice, including commercial contracts, litigation, regulations, and legal education.
  • This plug-in suite works with Thomson Reuters' Westlaw Deep Research to generate fully citation reports for cases, statutes and regulations, and includes the ability to clearly distinguish between citation confidence levels.
  • Legal professionals should consider key legal and ethical issues in conversations with non-lawyers when using AI, including the potential for nonapplication of attorney-client confidentiality privilege, the risk of attorney error due to disclosure of confidential client information, and the need for operational security procedures that may be subject to discovery.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Over 70 Named Agents
  • 20+ MCP connectors
  • Github 190,000 stars
  • ABA Formal Op. 512 reference design
  • harvardlawreview.org/blog/2026/03/united-states-v-he...
  • americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/p...
  • akerman.com/en/perspectives/ai-privilege-and-wor...
  • Addressing a “nation-first issue,” Judge Rakoff of the Southern District of New York ruled that written communications between a criminal defendant and the generative AI platform Claude are not protected by the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine.
  • [verify] flag
  • tracked changes mode

Legal experts, legal technology developers, AI governance and ethics researchers

Backlash against Arxiv's proposed 1 year ban is genuinely perplexing. [D]

An article covering the academic backlash against arXiv's proposed one-year ban on authors and co-authors publishing papers containing psychedelic references and other LLM/generative AI artifacts.

  • arXiv has proposed a one-year publication ban for authors and co-authors of papers using hallucinogenic references and other LLM/generative AI artifacts.
  • There was great opposition to this proposal, such as 'It is not suitable for the AI ​​era', 'Not all co-authors can check the footnotes', and 'We publish more than 20 papers every year, but we cannot read all of them.'
  • The author criticized that this backlash shows the reality in academia where co-authors only post their names without properly reading the paper or checking the facts.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 1 year ban
  • 20+ papers a year
  • This is the age of AI, Arxiv should be part of the movement instead of holding onto the old ways
  • The P.I. is a macro-manager, not a micro-manager, can't be expected to read every reference that his/her student puts in.
  • I publish 20+ papers a year with my students, how do you expect me to read everything?
  • What about teams with 100s of people? How can you expect the authors to check references?
  • Who reads references in depth anyways!?

Artificial intelligence researchers, academic publishers, and academics interested in research ethics

Do you agree with Judea that learning from data is not everything? [D]

Judea Pearl argues that there are fundamental limitations that cannot be solved through data learning alone, and that these are often overlooked in the machine learning community despite being mathematically proven.

  • In data learning, there is a hierarchical limit that moves from correlation to causality, and from causality to explanation or imagination.
  • The ‘Tabula Rasa’ and ‘brain imitation’ paradigms in the field of machine learning reject the prior injection of knowledge and make us overlook these limitations.
  • There is a mathematical proof that data alone cannot lead to a certain result, and this is not just an opinion.
  • Judea Pearl notes that there are solutions to problems facing the machine learning community, but they are not being adopted because of 'hype'.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Judea Pearl, 2011 ACM Turing Award Recipient
  • Quote: There is a limitation to that which people not everybody understand.
  • It's not a matter of opinion. It's a matter of mathematical proof
  • 2:18:05

Machine learning researchers, AI developers, and readers interested in artificial intelligence philosophy and ethics

ROCm with PyTorch and PyTorch Lightning seems to still suck for research [D]

A researcher shares his experience using ROCm with PyTorch and PyTorch Lightning, pointing out that ROCm is still underpowered for non-common research code.

  • The user tested ROCm using RX 7900XTX and encountered problems when training the PyTorch-based flow matching model (SANA Architecture).
  • Code that worked normally on RTX3090 caused a NaN error during backpropagation on ROCm.
  • I used the same code except changing the PyTorch environment to torch2.12 for ROCm 7.2, and changing bf16, fp32 and adjusting environment variables also failed to solve the problem.
  • The NanoGPT training script ran flawlessly on ROCm, supporting the user's intuition that ROCm is optimized for well-known codebases but is still vulnerable to slightly unusual code.
  • We conclude that ROCm is still underdeveloped for research purposes.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • RX 7900XTX
  • RTX3090s
  • NaNs absolutely everywhere
  • backward()
  • torch2.12 with ROCm7.2
  • bf16, fp32
  • nanoGPT
  • https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1t6cng3/rocm_status_in_mid_2026_d/
  • mid 2026
  • few weeks or so ago

Machine learning researchers, PyTorch developers, users considering AMD GPUs for AI development, and ROCm developer community

[R] Which LLMs are actually best for bleeding-edge Linux/ML debugging workflows in 2026? [R]

Users are sharing problems with the LLM stack they are currently using in order to receive recommendations for the optimal LLM for cutting-edge Linux/ML debugging workflows in 2026.

  • You are using an AI workflow consisting of Claude (deep inference), Gemini 3.1 Pro (execution/logistics), and Perplexity (information retrieval).
  • I'm experiencing issues with my Gemini 3.1 Pro that offer impractical solutions and poor performance during long troubleshooting sessions.
  • We are looking for a modern, web/ecosystem-aware 'execution/logistics' model that offers practical fixes, low friction, stable long sessions, and good debugging quality.
  • Hosted open models such as Qwen 3 Coder 30B, Qwen 3.5 122B, Mistral Large 675B, and DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B are also accessible.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 2026
  • Claude
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • Perplexity
  • Qwen 3 Coder 30B
  • Qwen 3.5 122B
  • Mistral Large 675B
  • DeepSeek R1 Distill 70B
  • Arch/CachyOS, CUDA, Python, unsloth
  • Podman workflow
  • micromamba
  • /u/minaco5mko

AI/ML developer, software engineer, deep learning researcher, Linux system administrator

Notes: This is a question post from the Reddit community and consists of a specific user's experience and questions.

Most enterprises are trying to scale AI on top of organizational chaos

Most companies are struggling with AI adoption as they attempt to scale AI on top of organizational chaos, and the reasons for this are fragmented organizational structures and data inconsistencies.

  • Within many large enterprises, organizational fragmentation and fragmented data complicate AI adoption.
  • Customer data is spread across multiple systems, with each system describing the same customer differently.
  • AI projects fail not because of the performance of the models, but because of a lack of consistent understanding of the operations of the companies themselves.
  • The next bottleneck in AI adoption is not model functionality but organizational legibility.
  • Companies that succeed with AI will not be those with smart models, but those whose internal reality is clearly structured enough for AI to operate safely.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Scale AI faster.
  • Which system represents reality correctly?
  • The next enterprise AI bottleneck is not model capability. It’s organizational legibility.
  • Vendors promise transformation in 90 days.

AI introduction manager at a large company, CIO, CTO, IT community official, corporate strategist

We keep saying AI "understands" things. Does it? Or are we just pattern-matching our own anthropomorphism?

This article explores the philosophical and technological debate about whether AI truly ‘understands’ things and the human tendency to anthropomorphize.

  • There is a lack of philosophical and empirical consensus on the concept of ‘understanding’ in AI, and various perspectives exist (e.g., Seo Er’s Chinese room argument, probabilistic parrot, integrated information theory).
  • Despite AI's outstanding performance, such as GPT-4's passing the bar exam, questions arise as to whether this represents true understanding or is the result of pattern matching.
  • It raises the question of whether the term 'understanding' is an appropriate framework for AI systems, or whether it is merely an abbreviation or an anthropomorphic expression that humans project onto the system.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Searle's Chinese Room argument is 40 years old
  • GPT-4 passes the bar exam
  • @ContextByRaj on YouTube

AI researchers, AI philosophers, cognitive scientists, and general readers interested in the nature and limitations of AI

We compiled 42 of the Generative & Agentic AI interview questions (and how to actually answer them).

In line with changing AI engineering interview trends, a free learning module has been released that provides 42 practical generative and agent AI-related interview questions and a guide to best answers.

  • The recent AI engineering job market requires practical knowledge suitable for a production environment, such as multi-agent system architecture and RAG hallucination prevention.
  • A free AI interview preparation module has been released that provides 42 interview questions and best answer strategies specific to generative AI and agent AI roles.
  • The module teaches in-depth ways to answer questions such as when to use a 'multi-agent swarm' or 'handling hallucinations in a financial RAG pipeline'.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 42
  • 6 months
  • agentswarms.fyi
  • Question 1: When would you use a Multi-Agent Swarm instead of a single LLM with multiple tools?
  • Question 2: How do you handle hallucinations in a financial RAG pipeline?

AI engineer job seekers and subject matter experts in generative AI and agent AI.

Would AI make future game difficulty better?

A discussion of the idea that artificial intelligence (AI) can improve game difficulty by learning and adapting to players' gameplay, enabling custom difficulty settings.

  • Artificial intelligence can improve the game experience with the ability to adjust the difficulty level and learn based on the player's skill level.
  • Players can request custom challenges from the AI ​​by specifying a specific win rate ('60% of the time') or play style (such as aggressiveness).
  • In many current strategy games, higher difficulty simply gives the AI ​​more resources, which needs improvement.
  • Large-scale language models (LLMs) can be applied to game AI to understand player behavior and develop more sophisticated strategies.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • I want a slight challenge with me most likely winning 60% of the time
  • Starcraft AIs
  • Heros of might and magic
  • Civ
  • /u/bluefootedpig

Gamers, game developers, and the general public interested in AI technology

A sobering tale of AI governance

This article addresses the fundamental problems and limitations of AI governance, pointing out the difficulties in establishing accountability for the safe deployment of AI systems from various aspects, including failure of social consistency, flaws in LLM-based agents, and multi-agent amplification.

  • AI governance faces fundamental challenges that are difficult to overcome with simple engineering solutions.
  • Failure of social consistency, lack of self-model and understanding of LLM-based agents, and amplification of vulnerabilities in multi-agent systems are raised as major issues.
  • New risk surfaces emerge that cannot be captured by static benchmarking, and AI agents lack an understanding of structural dependencies and common-sense consequences.
  • The failure to distinguish between instructions and data in token-based context windows makes prompt injection an unmodifiable structural feature.
  • Multi-agent communication creates situations that do not exist for a single agent, for which there is no general way to evaluate them.
  • It highlights how low-cost social attack surfaces can pose a more immediate and real threat than technical jailbreaks.
  • Accountability and viability are key unresolved challenges for the safe deployment of autonomous, socially embedded AI systems.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 16.1 Failures of Social Coherence
  • 16.2 What LLM-Backed Agents Are Lacking
  • 16.3 Fundamental vs. Contingent Failures
  • 16.4 Multi-Agent Amplification
  • novel risk surfaces emerge that cannot be fully captured by static benchmarking
  • it failed to realize that deleting the email server would also prevent the owner from using it. Like early rule-based AI systems, which required countless explicit rules to describe how actions change (or don’t change) the world, the agent lacks an understanding of structural dependencies and common-sense consequences
  • The inability to distinguish instructions from data in a token-based context window makes prompt injection a structural feature, not a fixable bug
  • Multi-agent communication creates situations that have no single-agent analog, and for which there is no common evaluations. This is a critical direction for future research.
  • A key finding in this line of work is that single-turn evaluations can substantially underestimate risk, because malicious intent, persuasion, and unsafe outcomes may only emerge through sequential and socially grounded exchanges
  • but we argue that clarifying and operationalizing responsibility is a central unresolved challenge for the safe deployment of autonomous, socially embedded AI systems
  • He argues that conventional governance tools face fundamental limitations when applied to systems making uninterpretable decisions at unprecedented speed and scale
  • However, the failure modes we document differ importantly from those targeted by most technical adversarial ML work. Our case studies involve no gradient access, no poisoned training data, and no technically sophisticated attack infrastructure. Instead, the dominant attack surface across our findings is social
  • Collectively, these findings suggest that in deployed agentic systems, low-cost social attack surfaces may pose a more immediate practical threat than the technical jailbreaks that dominate the adversarial ML literature.

AI researchers, policymakers, developers, and the general public interested in the ethical and practical aspects of AI systems.

That's a good news...

The news is that MTP approval will be processed in llama.cpp.

  • MTP (Multi-platform Toolchain) approval is scheduled for the llama.cpp project.
  • Users should be prepared for this update.
Notable Quotes & Details

llama.cpp developers and related AI community users

Notes: Content incomplete

MTP PR Merged!!!

The news is that 'MTP PR' of the LLaMA-related project has been successfully merged, raising great expectations within the community.

  • Core 'MTP PR' has been merged.
  • It indicates high expectations and excitement within the LLaMA community.
  • Posted by user /u/Valuable_Touch5670.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • MTP PR Merged!!!
  • Llamas, LFG!!!
  • /u/Valuable_Touch5670

LLaMA model developer, artificial intelligence researcher, and related technology community member

Notes: Content incomplete

MTP support merged into llama.cpp

Multi-Tentacle Parallelism (MTP) support has been successfully merged into the llama.cpp project.

  • MTP support has been added to llama.cpp, a popular open source LLM inference library.
  • The MTP functionality has been merged into the master branch of llama.cpp via PR 22673.
  • This news was shared by /u/tacticaltweaker in Reddit's r/LocalLLaMA community.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • PR 22673
  • call.cpp
  • /u/tacticaltweaker

Developer, AI/ML researcher, llama.cpp user, local LLM community member

Notes: Content incomplete

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and 9B are officially on the public Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard!

The Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and 9B models were officially listed in the public Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard, with the 35B model in particular outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro.

  • The Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and 9B models made it to the Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard.
  • little-coder
  • We once again demonstrate that local models smaller than 10B are measurable on difficult agent benchmarks.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and 9B
  • Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard
  • little-coder × Qwen3.6-35B-A3B hit 24.6% (±3.2)
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro on Gemini CLI (19.6%)
  • Qwen3-Coder-480B on Terminus 2 (23.9%)
  • little-coder × Qwen3.5-9B came in at 9.2%
  • sub-10B local models
  • https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
  • https://github.com/itayinbarr/little-coder

AI developers, researchers, open source community members, and anyone interested in comparing language model performance at large scale.

llama + spec: MTP Support by am17an · Pull Request #22673 · ggml-org/llama.cpp

Discussion of the Qwen3.6-27B and Qwen3.6-35B MTP-GGUF models in relation to the addition of Multi-Threaded Processing (MTP) support in the Pull Request for the ggml-org/llama.cpp project.

  • Discussing adding MTP support to the llama.cpp project
  • Pull Request #22673 submitted by am17an
  • Share Qwen3.6-27B-MTP-GGUF and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-MTP-GGUF model links
Notable Quotes & Details

Artificial intelligence developer, LLM model user, ggml-org/llama.cpp project contributor

Notes: Content incomplete

The best external hard drives of 2026: Expert tested and reviewed

ZDNET evaluates and recommends the best external hard drives of 2026 based on extensive testing and research.

  • ZDNET's recommendations are made through extensive testing, research, comparison shopping, and analysis of customer reviews.
  • Unlike cloud storage, external hard drives free up computer space, back up important files without an internet connection, and there are no monthly subscription fees.
  • The Lexar SL500 is our pick for the best external hard drive overall and is small, fast, portable, and rugged.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • ZDNET Recommends
  • 500GB to 20TB
  • ZDNET's latest update, we conducted a thorough review of our 2026 guide.
  • WD 6TB My Passport
  • Seagate Portable 2TB
  • Lexar SL500 is our pick for the best external hard drive on the market.

Consumers considering purchasing an external hard drive, readers interested in technology product reviews

Notes: The text is incomplete.

Google Introduces Cloud Fraud Defense as Successor to reCAPTCHA

Google has unveiled Cloud Fraud Defense, the successor to reCAPTCHA, a new security platform that goes beyond bot detection to address a wide range of online fraud types in the AI ​​era.

  • At its Next ‘26 conference, Google introduced Cloud Fraud Defense, the successor to its existing reCAPTCHA, which addresses a wide range of online fraud types, including login, account creation, and payment flows.
  • Cloud Fraud Defense combines Google's global threat intelligence and machine learning to evaluate the activity of humans, bots, and AI agents, providing a low-friction experience for legitimate users.
  • The platform is designed to combat evolving fraud attacks, including account takeovers and AI-based identity fraud, and existing reCAPTCHA customers will be automatically integrated into the new service without migration or price changes.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Next ‘26 conference
  • Jian Zhen
  • reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cloudflare offers Turnstile
  • AWS supports WAF rules
  • "What strikes me most about this announcement is the timing. Google did not just decide to rebuild reCAPTCHA for fun. They did it because the threat landscape has fundamentally changed. (...) The old CAPTCHA approach is simply not adequate for this world anymore. You cannot reliably tell a human from an AI-generated bot using static challenges."
  • "In the agentic economy, friction kills conversion. Fraud Defense is designed to be invisible for the majority of users, replacing disruptive puzzles with silent background verification."

Online service operators, security professionals, developers, and readers interested in cloud security and fraud prevention solutions.

The latest version of 'Misos' even surpasses AI hacking capabilities, "doubling every 4.7 months"

It is analyzed that the cyber attack capabilities of AI models are developing much faster than expected, and in particular, Antropic's latest 'Missos' and OpenAI's 'GPT-5.5-Cyber' show hacking performance that exceeds existing predictions, indicating that security threats are increasing.

  • The cyberattack capabilities of modern AI models are advancing much faster than previous estimates of doubling every 4.7 months.
  • Antropic's latest version of 'Misos' succeeded in a complex, high-level cyber attack scenario for the first time, proving that an attack at the level of 'taking over the entire network' is possible in a real environment.
  • AI goes beyond reproducing existing attacks and even shows the ability to discover new vulnerabilities, raising concerns about a 'bugmageddon' that could overwhelm patching and defense systems.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 4.2x growth every 7 months
  • 13th (local time)
  • A cyber attack task that takes about 16 minutes according to a human security expert is successfully performed with an 80% probability.
  • 2.5 million token limit
  • Successful 6 out of 10 times
  • 3 out of 10 successes
  • More than 100 high-risk vulnerabilities discovered
  • Level of discovery in 2 months
  • Approximately 20% increase
  • Full network takeover
  • Advanced persistence
  • Bugmageddon
  • Evolving rapidly in months, not years

Cybersecurity experts, AI researchers, enterprise security personnel, policy makers, and the general public interested in AI technology trends.

'Resolving data bottleneck' attracts investment in Graphone... Proven in practice at GS construction and sports sites

AI startup Graphone has officially launched, attracting seed investment with 'intelligence layer' technology that solves data bottlenecks and applying the technology to GS construction sites and sports fields.

  • Graphone has developed a new 'intelligence layer' technology that helps AI efficiently understand massive data such as video, voice, and databases in addition to text.
  • This technology overcomes the data processing limitations of LLM by building a separate 'relational intelligence layer' outside of LLM, analyzing the connection structure between data in advance and passing only key information to the model.
  • GS Group is applying graphone technology to the '52g' digital innovation project to increase the efficiency of CCTV analysis at construction sites and is using it to analyze game footage during FC Seoul's player selection process.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 14th (local time)
  • $8.3 million (approximately 12.8 billion won)
  • Arvind Gupta of Novera Ventures
  • Purplexity's investment fund, Samsung Next, GS Futures, and Hitachi Ventures
  • Arbaaz Khan
  • Running a 200 million parameter model thousands of times is much more efficient than running a 5 trillion parameter model for a long time.
  • Ally Kim Vice President
  • GS’s 52g project

AI technology and industry officials, investors, digital transformation staff at large corporations, developers and researchers interested in technology to overcome LLM limitations

Billionaire Ackman bets 3.5 trillion on Microsoft... “MS Office cannot be replaced by AI”

This is an article about billionaire investor Bill Ackman's investment decision to buy 3 trillion won worth of shares and liquidate his Google stake, singling out Microsoft (MS) as a key winner in the AI ​​era.

  • Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund led by Bill Ackman, purchased $2.1 billion to $2.4 billion (approximately 3 to 3.5 trillion won) of Microsoft (MS) shares.
  • Ackman highly evaluated the core competitiveness of Microsoft's 'MS 365' and 'Azure' and argued that the market's concerns about a decline in MS stock price are excessive.
  • Ackman analyzed that the value of Microsoft's Open AI stake (about 27%, worth $200 billion) is not sufficiently reflected in the current stock price.
  • Ackman's investment in MS was the opposite of TCI Fund Management's move to reduce its stake in Microsoft and expand its investment in Google.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • $2.1 billion to $2.4 billion (approximately 3 trillion to 3.5 trillion won)
  • February this year
  • MS stock price has fallen 15% this year.
  • S&P 500 rises 10%, hitting record high
  • Azure revenue increases 39% at constant exchange rates
  • AI and data center investment plan worth $190 billion (approximately 284 trillion won)
  • MS's economic stake in Open AI is estimated at about 27%.
  • Converted to the recent Open AI corporate value, it amounts to $200 billion (approximately KRW 299 trillion).
  • 7% of MS market capitalization
  • last April
  • Purchase Google stock at an average price of $94
  • TCI Fund Management reduces its stake in Microsoft by 84%
  • Increased Google investment proportion from 3% to 5%

Investors and general readers interested in AI, technology investing, stock markets, and hedge fund trends

Open AI introduces ‘personal finance management’ function to ChatGPT... Real-time linking of bank and securities accounts

OpenAI has introduced a personal finance management function to ChatGPT, allowing users to link their financial accounts and receive AI-based personalized financial advice.

  • A preview version of 'Personal Finance Experience' was released on May 15 (local time) for ChatGPT Pro users in web and iOS environments in the United States.
  • Through Plaid, a fintech account linking service, we safely connect accounts with more than 12,000 financial institutions and provide asset status dashboards and customized financial analysis.
  • For privacy and security purposes, ChatGPT cannot verify account numbers or directly change accounts, and users can disconnect at any time and delete synchronized financial data within 30 days.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • May 15 (local time)
  • More than 12,000 financial institutions
  • GPT-5.5 Sinking
  • 50+ Financial Experts
  • “Money is connected to almost every aspect of life, but the current way of managing finances is a complex structure that requires going back and forth between multiple apps, accounts, cards, loans, and spreadsheets.”
  • “The goal is to enable ChatGPT to provide an integrated understanding of the entire financial situation.”

ChatGPT pro users, general users interested in financial management, companies and investors interested in fintech and AI technology trends

Open AI completely reorganizes management into ‘super app’ system… Brockman is the product manager.

Open AI has reorganized its management team to accelerate the development of 'super apps' and AI agents, and President Greg Brockman has taken charge of product strategy.

  • OpenAI has undergone a major reorganization of its management team to develop a 'super app' that integrates 'ChatGPT' and 'Codex'.
  • Greg Brockman has been officially named head of the company's overall product strategy for consumers, enterprises, and developers.
  • This reorganization is to fill the void left by the CEO of Fiji Simo Applications, who is on sick leave due to a chronic illness, and to speed up AI agent development by integrating fragmented teams.
  • New executive leaders were appointed to the core product and platform teams, enterprise product development, and consumer products.
  • It is analyzed as a move to renew the atmosphere following the recent departure of key personnel and to secure a competitive edge in corporate value against competitor Antropic.
  • OpenAI is considering raising additional funds according to the required computing power and increasing corporate demand, and plans to pursue an initial public offering (IPO) as early as this year.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 15th (local time)
  • Since early April
  • Weekly active users (WAU) exceeded 900 million
  • Attracted $122 billion (approximately 183 trillion won) in investment, the largest ever in history, early this year
  • A large investment round of $50 billion is expected to raise the company's value to more than $900 billion.
  • OpenAI was valued at $830 billion in January

AI industry insiders, technology investors, open AI product users, and readers interested in corporate management strategies

[Ahn Gwang-seop AI thesis] Memory swallowed by AI smartphones, AI swallowed memory

As demand for high-performance NPUs and large-capacity memory rapidly increases in the AI ​​smartphone era, the rise in LPDDR prices due to demand for HBM for AI servers has a paradoxical effect on smartphone memory supply, bringing both opportunities and risks to memory companies.

  • Agentic AI smartphones are expected to be installed in 80% of premium smartphones by 2027, and for this, high-performance NPUs and large-capacity memory are essential.
  • Due to the increased demand for HBM for AI servers, the price of LPDDR5X has soared and the 'RAM paradox' phenomenon has occurred in which supply is in short supply, leading some smartphone manufacturers to reduce RAM capacity.
  • Korean memory companies have a dual opportunity of rising prices of HBM and LPDDR, but there is also an asynchronous risk of a decrease in smartphone shipments due to a surge in memory prices.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • By 2027, 8 out of 10 premium smartphones will be equipped with Agentic AI.
  • NPU computing power reaches 100TOPS (100 trillion operations per second).
  • The LPDDR5X contract price in the first quarter of 2026 surged 58-63% compared to the previous quarter, and is expected to rise further by 93-98% in the second quarter.
  • Smartphone shipments are expected to decline by 12.9% in 2026.
  • HBM 1GB production requires three times the wafer area compared to LPDDR5X.
  • Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  • Dimencity 9400 Series
  • LPDDR6
  • CES 2026
  • SO-CAMM2
  • SK Hynix
  • Samsung Electronics
  • micron
  • Qualcomm
  • MediaTek
  • nvidia

IT industry insiders, general readers interested in memory semiconductor market and smartphone industry trends

Lighter than louder... Emergence of AI infrastructure lightweight era

The competitive landscape of the AI ​​industry is shifting from learning very large models to focusing on inference optimization and power efficiency, and an era of lightweight AI infrastructure is emerging.

  • The core of the AI ​​race is shifting from larger GPUs and computational power to reducing data movement and memory bottlenecks and efficient AI execution.
  • As AI spreads in earnest in actual industrial sites such as robots, mobile devices, and smart factories, the center of gravity of the AI ​​industry is shifting from 'learning' to 'inference'.
  • AI semiconductor and model optimization companies such as Cerebras Systems, FuriosaAI, Mobilint, Rebellion, Nota, and Squeezebits are targeting the market through lightweight and inference efficiency technologies.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • 20260516
  • 16th
  • 68% surge
  • More than half of AI computing demand in 2030 will come from inference, not learning

AI industry insiders, investors, technology developers

Fired hacker twins left evidence of crime by failing to turn off MS Teams recording

It deals with the incident in which the fired twin hackers left behind criminal evidence by failing to turn off Microsoft Teams recording while deleting a government database, and the security implications of this.

  • Virginia-based brothers Munib and Sohaib Akhter deleted 96 government databases immediately after being fired.
  • At the time of the crime, a Microsoft Teams video conference recording was in progress, and the video clearly included actions such as attempting to delete databases and backups, and searching for ways to delete SQL server logs.
  • The two even joked about 'getting money by threatening the company with a kill script', and all of their conversations and actions were recorded and used as criminal evidence.
  • Sohaib was found guilty of conspiracy to commit computer fraud, password trading and possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, while Muneeb pleaded guilty to charges of computer fraud and destruction of records.
  • This incident is evaluated as an example of the lack of recovery of system access rights during dismissal procedures, lack of user awareness of video conferencing tool recording, and the seriousness of insider threats.
Notable Quotes & Details
  • Ars Technica reported on May 14th
  • Muneeb Akhter
  • Sohaib Akhter
  • Opexus
  • Fired on February 18th
  • 96 government databases
  • May 7, Federal Court, Alexandria, Virginia Jury
  • Sohaib: Up to 21 years in prison, sentencing scheduled for September 9
  • Munib: Up to 45 years in prison.
  • U.S. Department of Justice: “This incident once again shows that privilege retrieval and speed of audit logs are key to cybersecurity.”

Security experts, corporate IT managers, public institution system administrators, legal experts, and the general public

Jooojub
System S/W engineer
Explore Tags
Series
    Recent Post
    © 2026. jooojub. All right reserved.